[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEFB823.4040607@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:57:07 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] Add "handle page fault" PV helper.
On 11/03/2009 01:35 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> We can't add an exception vector since all the existing ones are either
>> taken or reserved.
>
>
> I believe some are reserved for operating system use.
Table 6-1 says:
9 | | Coprocessor Segment Overrun (reserved) | Fault | No |
Floating-point instruction.2
15 | — | (Intel reserved. Do not use.) | | No |
20-31 | — | Intel reserved. Do not use. |
32-255 | — | User Defined (Non-reserved) Interrupts | Interrupt
| | External interrupt or INT n instruction.
So we can only use 32-255, but these are not fault-like exceptions that
can be delivered with interrupts disabled.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists