[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104090140.GA14694@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:01:40 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, stable@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>,
Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
Tobias Oetiker <tobi@...iker.ch>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use
ALLOC_HARDER
> I hope we can move this to another thread if people would like to remove
> this exemption completely instead of talking about this trivial fix, which
> I doubt there's any objection to.
I'm arguing that this "trivial fix" is wrong, and that you should just
remove those two lines.
If going into reserves from interrupts hurts, doing that from task
context will hurt, too. "realtime" task should not be normally allowed
to "hurt" the system like that.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists