[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104111957.GA13549@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:19:57 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaud Patard <apatard@...driva.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, huhb@...ote.com,
yanh@...ote.com, Zhang Le <r0bertz@...too.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>, zhangfx@...ote.com,
liujl@...ote.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > Small question : Why don't you restrict to 64bit kernels only ? From
> > what I remember from some discussions with ST, trying to use a 32-bit
> > kernel on 2f is a nice way to get troubles. It would be better imho to
> > forbid such a configuration. As a side effect, this will remove all
> > 'defined(CONFIG_64BIT)' parts of your #ifdef tests.
> >
>
> It's hard to make such a decision ;) Perhaps some guys want to play with
> the 32bit version.
We have other systems where 32-bit kernel support is just remarkably ugly.
We've dropped 32-bit support for the SGI IP32 aka O2 - nobody seems to even
have really noticed that. The Sibyte systems would be good candidates to do
the same as accesses to outside the 32-bit address space are needed very
frequently.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists