[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104114353.GA3607@sortiz.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:43:54 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
Simtec Liunx Team <linux@...tec.co.uk>
Subject: Re: tps65010: Allow the board to choose any GPIO base.
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:52:20PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> If the board does not care where the TPS turns up, then specifiying the
> value -1 to get gpiolib to dynamically allocate the base for the chip
> is valid.
>
> Change the test to look for != 0, so that any boards specifying zero
> will not end up with gpio that they didn't want.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Simtec Liunx Team <linux@...tec.co.uk>
Applied, thanks a lot.
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps65010.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c 2009-10-21 19:09:28.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c 2009-10-21 19:09:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static int tps65010_probe(struct i2c_cli
> tps, DEBUG_FOPS);
>
> /* optionally register GPIOs */
> - if (board && board->base > 0) {
> + if (board && board->base != 0) {
> tps->outmask = board->outmask;
>
> tps->chip.label = client->name;
>
> --
> Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
>
> 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists