[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104121520.GC16993@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:15:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the
deprecated cpumask_t
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Mind sending this against latest -tip? We already have:
b8a4754: x86, msr: Unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus
which makes your patch not apply:
patching file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 247.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
patching file arch/x86/lib/msr.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 78.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/lib/msr.c
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists