linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:15:20 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the
	deprecated cpumask_t


* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h |    4 ++--
>  arch/x86/lib/msr.c         |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Mind sending this against latest -tip? We already have:

  b8a4754: x86, msr: Unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus

which makes your patch not apply:

 patching file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 247.
 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
 patching file arch/x86/lib/msr.c
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 78.
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/lib/msr.c

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/