[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104130828.GC8920@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:08:28 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:59:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Fine?
>
> I cannot say -- are there paths that could drop the device beforehand?
Do you mean drop the mm reference?
> (as in do you hold a reference to it?)
By design I think I always have a reference to mm before I use it.
This works like this:
ioctl SET_OWNER - calls get_task_mm, I think this gets a reference to mm
ioctl SET_BACKEND - checks that SET_OWNER was run, starts virtqueue
ioctl RESET_OWNER - stops virtqueues, drops the reference to mm
file close - stops virtqueues, if we still have it then drops mm
This is why I think I can call use_mm/unuse_mm while virtqueue is running,
safely.
Makes sense?
> -Andi
> --
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists