[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0911041427400.9988@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:28:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: processor: fix section mismatch
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o(.text+0x99a): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function acpi_processor_add() to the function
> .cpuinit.text:acpi_processor_power_init()
>
> acpi_processor_add replaced acpi_processor_start which had __cpuinit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index c567b46..ec742a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_cpu_notifier =
> .notifier_call = acpi_cpu_soft_notify,
> };
>
> -static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
> int result = 0;
I don't see this patch in today's linux-next ... ACPI guys, are you going
to merge it?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists