[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x498wemuy6v.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:06:16 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] blkio: Introduce the notion of weights
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> o Introduce the notion of weights. Priorities are mapped to weights internally.
> These weights will be useful once IO groups are introduced and group's share
> will be decided by the group weight.
I'm sorry, but I need more background to review this patch. Where do
the min and max come from? Why do you scale 7-0 from 200-900? How does
this map to what was there before (exactly, approximately)?
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists