[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1257348117.31972.4360.camel@nimitz>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:21:57 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...ibm.com>,
libcg-devel <libcg-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
Jan Safranek <jsafrane@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be
> mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup
> is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote
> for it as +1 for /cgroup.
/dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does
deal with actual devices. cgroups do not.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists