[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49zl72tiam.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:34:57 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/20] blkio: Provide capablity to enqueue/dequeue group entities
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> o This patch embeds cfq_entity object in cfq_group and provides helper routines
> so that group entities can be scheduled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index bc99163..8ec8a82 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct cfq_service_tree {
> #define CFQ_RB_ROOT (struct cfq_service_tree) { RB_ROOT, NULL, 0, NULL}
>
> struct cfq_sched_data {
> + unsigned int nr_active;
> struct cfq_service_tree service_tree[IO_IOPRIO_CLASSES];
> };
>
> @@ -89,6 +90,10 @@ struct cfq_entity {
> struct cfq_service_tree *st;
> unsigned short ioprio_class;
> bool ioprio_class_changed;
> + struct cfq_entity *parent;
> + bool on_st;
> + /* Points to the sched_data of group entity. Null for cfqq */
> + struct cfq_sched_data *my_sd;
Why my_sd? None of the other members required a my. ;-)
> +static inline struct cfq_entity *parent_entity(struct cfq_entity *cfqe)
> +{
> + return cfqe->parent;
> +}
Wow, is this really necessary for a pointer dereference?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
> +/* check for entity->parent so that loop is not executed for root entity. */
> +#define for_each_entity(entity) \
> + for (; entity && entity->parent; entity = entity->parent)
See, you don't use it here!
> @@ -660,7 +723,13 @@ static void enqueue_cfqe(struct cfq_entity *cfqe)
>
> static void enqueue_cfqq(struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> {
> - enqueue_cfqe(&cfqq->entity);
> + struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqq->entity;
> +
> + for_each_entity(cfqe) {
> + if (cfqe->on_st)
> + break;
> + enqueue_cfqe(cfqe);
> + }
> }
Maybe I'm slow, but I would have benefitted from a comment above that
function stating that we have to walk up the tree to make sure that the
parent is also scheduled.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists