[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF1A34B.80109@bitbox.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:52:43 +0000
From: Peter Horton <phorton@...box.co.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: ecashin@...aid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent AoE causing cache aliases
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:54:34 +0000 Peter Horton <phorton@...box.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:22:28 +0100
>>> phorton@...box.co.uk (Peter Horton) wrote:
>>>
>>>> To: ecashin@...aid.com
>>> Have you heard back from Ed on this?
>>>
>> No.
>>
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] prevent AoE causing cache aliases
>>>> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:22:28 +0100
>>>> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
>>>> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
>>>>
>>>> This patch prevents the AoE block driver from creating cache aliases of
>>>> page cache pages on machines with virtually indexed caches.
>>>>
>>>> Building kernels on an AT91SAM9G20 board without this patch fails with
>>>> segmentation faults after a couple of passes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: linux-2.6.31/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- linux-2.6.31.orig/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c 2009-09-09 23:13:59.000000000 +0100
>>>> +++ linux-2.6.31/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c 2009-10-22 10:24:50.000000000 +0100
>>>> @@ -735,6 +735,21 @@
>>>> part_stat_unlock();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Ensure we don't create aliases in VI caches
>>>> + */
>>>> +static inline void
>>>> +killalias(struct bio *bio)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct bio_vec *bv;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ)
>>>> + __bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i, 0) {
>>>> + flush_dcache_page(bv->bv_page);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> void
>>>> aoecmd_ata_rsp(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -853,8 +868,12 @@
>>>>
>>>> if (buf && --buf->nframesout == 0 && buf->resid == 0) {
>>>> diskstats(d->gd, buf->bio, jiffies - buf->stime, buf->sector);
>>>> - n = (buf->flags & BUFFL_FAIL) ? -EIO : 0;
>>>> - bio_endio(buf->bio, n);
>>>> + if (buf->flags & BUFFL_FAIL)
>>>> + bio_endio(buf->bio, -EIO);
>>>> + else {
>>>> + killalias(buf->bio);
>>>> + bio_endio(buf->bio, 0);
>>>> + }
>>>> mempool_free(buf, d->bufpool);
>>>> }
>>> Looks OK.
>>>
>>> This bugfix will cause a pointless __bio_for_each_segment() busywait
>>> loop to be executed on architectures for which flush_dcache_page() is a
>>> no-op.
>>>
>>> We don't have infrastructure to fix that.
>> Couldn't we add a flag to the bio that users could set to indicate that
>> they are not house trained with respect to the D-cache (i.e non-DMA
>> drivers). Architectures that needed to could then flush the relevant
>> pages in the bio_endio() path somewhere. At the moment all the non-DMA
>> block drivers need to be aware of the cache aliasing issue which means
>> this problem keeps arising ...
>>
>
> Could. We'll need to change each arch _somehow_. Even if it's a
> matter of adding `#define i_am_not_house_trained' to the troublesome
> ones or something, then ifdeffing existing code.
>
> I was thinking that a general bio_flush_dcache_pages() in block core
> (or in each arch) would be a suitable way to handle this but I was
> unable to find other drivers which needed it after a brief search.
>
>
IDE does it at a lower level (arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/ide.h
for example).
Looks like the generic PIO ops in drivers/ata/libata-sff.c could cause
problems too.
I think the problem is often masked by the small cache sizes on the
platforms with VI caches. The original AoE problem I see is on an ARM926
with 32K D-cache, I don't see the problem at all on another ARM926 with
16K D-cache.
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists