[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFC90831A4.A99EC411-ON48257664.00080761-48257664.0009EC42@sunplusct.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:47:59 +0800
From: liqin.chen@...plusct.com
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liqin.gnu@...il.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: Fix typo in asm-generic/unistd.h.
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> 写于 2009-11-03 16:52:17:
> Is there any reason to use glibc-2.5 though? The current release
> is 2.10.1, and the version you used is over three years old.
We found many stable toolchain use glibc-2.5. so we select it.
In fact, what we think first is to could used it in product。
Even linux kernel, in company we still use kernel-2.6.27 version.
> Do you have plans to merge your port into eglibc when it's done?
>
We have not this plan now.
Liqin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists