[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911031759350.1187@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:00:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] mm: slab allocate memory section nodemask for large
systems
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Alex Chiang wrote:
> Any comments on this patch series?
>
> Turns out that Kame-san's fear about a memory section spanning
> several nodes on certain architectures (S390) isn't really
> applicable and even if it were, we have code to handle situation
> anyway.
>
> Kame-san was generally supportive of these convenience symlinks
> although he did not give a formal ACK.
>
> David has given an ACK on the two patches that do real work, as
> well as supplied the below patch.
>
> I can respin this series once more, including David's Acked-by:
> and adding his patch if that makes life easier for you.
>
It's probably in Andrew's queue after getting back from the kernel summit,
it would be best to wait a week or so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists