[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104110904.7ffc479b@s6510>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:09:04 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Rakesh Ranjan <rakesh@...lsio.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>, davem@...emloft.net,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Karen Xie <kxie@...lsio.com>,
"open-iscsi@...glegroups.com" <open-iscsi@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rakesh Ranjan <rakesh@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH] dhcp provisioning support in cxgb3i
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:54:07 +0530
Rakesh Ranjan <rakesh@...lsio.com> wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
> > Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
> >> Mike Christie wrote:
> >>> Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
> >>>> Hi Mike,
> >>>>
> >>>> Herein attached patches for having dhcp provisioning support in
> >>>> cxgb3i. I have added one new iscsi netlink message
> >>>> ISCSI_UEVENT_REQ_IPCONF.
> >>>
> >>> Is the idea to have iscsid/uip send down this msg?
> >>>
> >>> Was it not possible to hook in more like how bnx2i does dhcp?
> >>
> >> yep, idea is to have iscsid send down ISCSI_UEVENT_REQ_IPCONF msg.
> >> bnx2i approach in our case for at least T3 is not feasible.
> >>
> >
> > I think adding DHCP in the kernel is getting a little crazy :) If we go
> > down this path, I agree with the other person that stated it should at
> > least be generic.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> What do you mean be generic ? Do you want to have a generic interface
> for DHCP handler that could be part of libiscsi and could be used by
> other LLD's.
Is there anyway to make existing code (in net/ipv4/ipconfig.c) more generic
and useful for both?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists