[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49k4y6rsz5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:27:10 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Block IO Controller V1
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:12:19PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > This is V1 of the Block IO controller patches on top of 2.6.32-rc5.
>> >
>> > A consolidated patch can be found here:
>> >
>> > http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/io-controller/blkio-controller/blkio-controller-v1.patch
>>
>> Overall it looks good. Vivek, could you please run some benchmarks
>> against a vanilla kernel and then with your patch applied and cgroups
>> compiled in but not configured?
>>
>
> Sure I can. Do you have something specific in mind?
I don't, actually. iozone comes to mind as a simple test to setup and
run. Or you could run one or more of the fio sample job files. Really,
I just want to see if we're taking a huge performance hit so we can fix
that up before it's merged.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists