[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104193852.GN2870@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:38:52 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Block IO Controller V1
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:27:10PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:12:19PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > This is V1 of the Block IO controller patches on top of 2.6.32-rc5.
> >> >
> >> > A consolidated patch can be found here:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/io-controller/blkio-controller/blkio-controller-v1.patch
> >>
> >> Overall it looks good. Vivek, could you please run some benchmarks
> >> against a vanilla kernel and then with your patch applied and cgroups
> >> compiled in but not configured?
> >>
> >
> > Sure I can. Do you have something specific in mind?
>
> I don't, actually. iozone comes to mind as a simple test to setup and
> run. Or you could run one or more of the fio sample job files. Really,
> I just want to see if we're taking a huge performance hit so we can fix
> that up before it's merged.
Sure, will run some tests to see if this patchset is introducing any huge
performance regressions somewhere.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists