[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <646765f40911041455m7a6f55b8ka3ce95de7dd6ac6c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:55:39 +1100
From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers
Bart,
FWIW, this all looks good to me, except for these comments:
1. When you introduce struct rt2800_ops, it may telegraph your
intentions more clearly if you introduce rt2800lib.h at the same time
- this also means that we don't have (if only for a single patch)
duplicate versions of this structure and it's associated code.
2. Patches #26-28 should arguably come before the conversions to use
the struct rt2800_ops methods.
3. I don't get the reasoning behind patch #37 (remove useless ifdefs
from rt2x00leds.h) but I'm going to assume that it's all right.
4. Patch #39 should arguably come earlier in the patch set as it's a
general cleanup.
Other than that, good work!
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists