[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104234519.GA4587@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:45:19 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] power: pcf50633: properly reenable charging when
the supply conditions change
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:24:31AM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
[...]
> > If you want to "top-up" the battery, perhaps that should be on
> > explicit request, like something in /sys?
>
> Well, probably but to me it seems like an unnecessary complexity. Also
> since Li* batteries are dominating the market nowadays this
> functionality would need to be introduced in the power_supply core to
> provide userspace with a consistent interface. Anton, can you please
> comment on this?
Power supply class doesn't have writeable properties (initially
it was a 'battery monitor class'). Though. I'd happily merge
the support for writeable properties. ACPI batteries would
benefit too, i.e. they could export 'alarm' property (see
drivers/acpi/battery.c).
Though, I'd want to apply this patch set as is (i.e. I prefer
the new behaviour, as it's really more 'user friendly'), and
we could implement configurable option later.
Pavel do you have a strong objection against this patch, or
you can live with it? :-)
Thanks!
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists