[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911052245.41803.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:45:41 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t
This makes the declarations match the definitions, which already use
'struct cpumask'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 9a00219..5bef931 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
return 0;
}
-static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs)
{
rdmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
}
-static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs)
{
wrmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists