linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 resend] vfs: new O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:15:45 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	dhowells@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, adilger@....com,
	mtk.manpages@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	drepper@...il.com, jamie@...reable.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 resend] vfs: new O_NODE open flag

>  - re-opening normally after checking file type (there's a debate
>    whether this would have security issues, but currently we do allow
>    re-opening with increased permissions thorugh /proc/*/fd)

Which has already been demonstrated to be an (unfixed) security hole.

> Filesystems which want to install special file operations for O_NODE
> opens (e.g. ioctl) may set S_OPEN_NODE flag in the inode.  This will

Wrong way around. The defailt should be that O_NODE fails for any handle
which has not specifically added support.

It'll fill itself in where it matters pretty fast that way but cases will
get reviewed which is critical.

You also need to address the open with no permissions pinning a removable
device question.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/