[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091105162043.GA2611@hack>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:20:44 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max@...mpel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, mk@...all.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe: don't block after data has been written
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:31:47PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
>According to the select() / poll() documentation, a write operation on
>a file descriptor which is "ready for writing" must not block. Linux
>violates this rule: if you pass a very large buffer to write(), the
>system call will not return until everything is written, or an error
>occurs.
>
>This patch adds a simple check: if at least one byte has already been
>written, break from the loop, instead of calling pipe_wait().
Do you have any working test-case for this?
Thanks.
>
>Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max@...mpel.org>
>---
>
> fs/pipe.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
>index ae17d02..9d84f0b 100644
>--- a/fs/pipe.c
>+++ b/fs/pipe.c
>@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ redo2:
> }
> if (bufs < PIPE_BUFFERS)
> continue;
>- if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
>+ if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK || ret > 0) {
> if (!ret)
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> break;
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Live like a child, think like the god.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists