linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for November 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:17:11 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To:	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 5

On Thursday 05 November 2009 09:31:04 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday 05 November 2009 03:38:27 am Sachin Sant wrote:
> > Today's next tree fails to build on i386 with
> > 
> > arch/x86/pci/built-in.o: In function `align_resource':
> > arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:82: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > 
> > The code in question was added by commit
> > 03db42adfeeabe856dbb6894dd3aaff55838330a.
> 
> I'll look into this.  I did build and test a 32-bit x86 kernel, but
> I built it on an x86_64 box using "linux32 make ...", which looks like
> it used gcc 4.3.2.

Can you try the patch below, please?


commit 00f16f0a2f4826eadec0565e4b454ab8bc7824cc
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Date:   Thu Nov 5 10:03:57 2009 -0700

    x86/PCI: remove 64-bit division
    
    The roundup() caused a build error (undefined reference to `__udivdi3').
    We're aligning to power-of-two boundaries, so it's simpler to just use
    ALIGN() anyway, which avoids the division.
    
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 8ddf4f4..959e548 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -69,17 +69,17 @@ align_resource(struct acpi_device *bridge, struct resource *res)
 	 * that claim this address space have starting alignment and length
 	 * constraints, so fix any obvious BIOS goofs.
 	 */
-	if (res->start & (align - 1)) {
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->start, align)) {
 		dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bridge->dev,
 			   "host bridge window %pR invalid; "
 			   "aligning start to %d-byte boundary\n", res, align);
 		res->start &= ~(align - 1);
 	}
-	if ((res->end + 1) & (align - 1)) {
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->end + 1, align)) {
 		dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bridge->dev,
 			   "host bridge window %pR invalid; "
 			   "aligning end to %d-byte boundary\n", res, align);
-		res->end = roundup(res->end, align) - 1;
+		res->end = ALIGN(res->end, align) - 1;
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/