[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911051949.30187.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:49:29 +0100
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/41] rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
On Wednesday 04 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
>
> Part of preparations for later code unification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
The macros are the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb.
So it might be better to move the entire define set into rt2800lib.h
If you haven't done so already in a subsequent patch, please fix it,
otherwise:
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>
Ivo
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c
> @@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(nohwcrypt, "Disable har
> * The _lock versions must be used if you already hold the csr_mutex
> */
> #define WAIT_FOR_BBP(__dev, __reg) \
> - rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> + rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), BBP_CSR_CFG, BBP_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> #define WAIT_FOR_RFCSR(__dev, __reg) \
> - rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> + rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG, RF_CSR_CFG_BUSY, (__reg))
> #define WAIT_FOR_RF(__dev, __reg) \
> - rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
> + rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), RF_CSR_CFG0, RF_CSR_CFG0_BUSY, (__reg))
> #define WAIT_FOR_MCU(__dev, __reg) \
> - rt2x00pci_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> - H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
> + rt2800_regbusy_read((__dev), H2M_MAILBOX_CSR, \
> + H2M_MAILBOX_CSR_OWNER, (__reg))
>
> static void rt2800pci_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> const unsigned int word, const u8 value)
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void rt2800pci_efuse_read(struct
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, reg);
>
> /* Wait until the EEPROM has been loaded */
> - rt2x00pci_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, EFUSE_CTRL_KICK, ®);
> + rt2800_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, EFUSE_CTRL_KICK, ®);
>
> /* Apparently the data is read from end to start */
> rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA3,
> Index: b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,14 @@ static inline void rt2800_register_multi
> rt2x00pci_register_multiwrite(rt2x00dev, offset, value, length);
> }
>
> +static inline int rt2800_regbusy_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> + const unsigned int offset,
> + const struct rt2x00_field32 field,
> + u32 *reg)
> +{
> + return rt2x00pci_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, offset, field, reg);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * RF chip defines.
> *
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists