[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091105190203.GA1392@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:02:03 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
vedran.furac@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] oom_kill: avoid depends on total_vm and use real
RSS/swap value for oom_score (Re: Memory overcommit
Hi!
> Agreed it's not obvious. Intuitively I think only including RSS and no
> swap is best, but clearly I can't be entirely against including swap
> too as there may be scenarios where including swap provides for a
> better choice.
>
> My argument for not including swap is that we kill tasks to free RAM
> (we don't really care to free swap, system needs RAM at oom time).
System should be out of _virtual_ memory at that point, so yes,
freeing swap should help, too.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists