linux-kernel - Re: Kernel Options: To use MSI-X or not?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AF216D3.4040903@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:05:39 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Options: To use MSI-X or not?

On 11/04/2009 10:53 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was curious whether its best to use MSI-X when the driver supports it
> or not?
>
> Example, 3ware cards/Intel Audio Drivers you can use MSI-X instead of
> having several devices use/share an interrupt.
>
> What are the pros/cons to using MSI-X vs. having devices share an IRQ?

Normally using MSI/MSI-X is always better (or at least no worse), 
assuming it works properly on the system and on the device.. Hopefully 
by this point we've fixed most or all the system-related problems or 
forced MSI off on platforms where it can't work properly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/