linux-kernel - Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091106073946.GV31511@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:39:46 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, npiggin@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:03:39PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > For example it will definitely impact the AIM7 multi brk() issue
> > or the mysql allocation case, which are all writer intensive. I assume
> > doing a lot of mmaps/brks in parallel is not that uncommon.
> 
> No its not that common. Page faults are much more common. The AIM7 seems
> to be an artificial case? What does mysql do for allocation? If its brk()

AIM7 is artificial yes, but I suspect similar problems (to a less
extreme degree) are in other workloads.

> related then simply going to larger increases may fix the issue??

For mysql it's mmap through malloc(). There has been some tuning in
glibc for it. But I suspect it's a more general problem that will
still need kernel improvements.

> 
> > My thinking was more that we simply need per VMA locking or
> > some other per larger address range locking. Unfortunately that
> > needs changes in a lot of users that mess with the VMA lists
> > (perhaps really needs some better abstractions for VMA list management
> > first)
> 
> We have range locking through the distribution of the ptl for systems with
> more than 4 processors. One can use that today to lock ranges of the
> address space.

Yes but all the major calls still take mmap_sem, which is not ranged.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/