linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200911061004.01007.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:04:00 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.

Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> 
> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core
> binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390:

kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl':
kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function 
'lock_kernel'
kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function 
'unlock_kernel'

Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/