[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m18wejanw4.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:33:31 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> writes:
> Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>
>> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core
>> binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390:
>
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl':
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'lock_kernel'
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'unlock_kernel'
Bah. A missing smp_lock.h.
Thanks.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists