linux-kernel - Re: Performance regression in IO scheduler still there

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x494op7ivtu.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:14:53 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Performance regression in IO scheduler still there

Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> writes:

> Hi Jeff,
> what hardware are you using for tests?
> I see aggregated random read bandwidth is larger than sequential read
> bandwidth, and write bandwidth greater than read.
> Is this a SAN with multiple independent spindles?

Yeah, this is a single path to an HP EVA storage array.  There are 24 or
so disks striped in the pool used to create the volume I am using.  Jan,
could you repeat your tests with /sys/block/sdX/queue/iosched/low_latency
set to 0?

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/