2.6.29-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Ben Hutchings commit 5c36fe3d87b3f0c85894a49193c66096a3d6b26f upstream. As found in , hfsplus is using type u32 rather than sector_t for some sector number calculations. In particular, hfsplus_get_block() does: u32 ablock, dblock, mask; ... map_bh(bh_result, sb, (dblock << HFSPLUS_SB(sb).fs_shift) + HFSPLUS_SB(sb).blockoffset + (iblock & mask)); I am not confident that I can find and fix all cases where a sector number may be truncated. For now, avoid data loss by refusing to mount HFS+ volumes with more than 2^32 sectors (2TB). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix 32 and 64-bit issues] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Cc: Eric Sesterhenn Cc: Roman Zippel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) --- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ int hfsplus_read_wrapper(struct super_bl if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size)) return -EINVAL; + if ((u64)part_start + part_size > 0x100000000ULL) { + pr_err("hfs: volumes larger than 2TB are not supported yet\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } while (1) { bh = sb_bread512(sb, part_start + HFSPLUS_VOLHEAD_SECTOR, vhdr); if (!bh) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/