| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m3r5sbcl07.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:05:12 +0100 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: "Martin Schleier" <drahemmaps@....net> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode "Martin Schleier" <drahemmaps@....net> writes: > e.g: > - correct use of some blackfin hi/lo macros. > - if certain data structures are declared as const > (struct seq_operations/file_operations) > - correct use of NR_CPUS is usually wrong > - complains about in_atomic() outside core kernel code > - warns about LINUX_VERSION_CODE, #if 0, > volatile or deprecated functions. > - informs about needless kfree/usb_free_urb checks > - etc... Did the patch in question contain such problems? -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists