[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257480548.2837.121.camel@2710p.home>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:09:08 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Obey coherent_dma_mask for alloc_coherent
on passthrough
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:34 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:19:52 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 11:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > > This is fine for 2.6.32 but we'll cleanly fix this by using
> > > swiotlb_dma_ops later, right?
> >
> > I'm open to suggestions. I don't really understand why we dropped
> > swiotlb for passthrough mode in 2.6.32 to start with. It seems like we
> > now have a couple corner cases where we have to either hope for the best
> > or effectively ignore the request to use passthrough. Thanks,
>
> I think that the cleanest solution is setting up swiotlb_dma_ops for
> passthrough devices (and devices not behind pci, etc). Calgary IOMMU
> does the same for years.
intel-iommu was using swiotlb for the global dma_ops when in passthrough
mode until 19943b0e (2.6.31 and earlier). I would say the next step
would be to use per device dma_ops so we can point passthrough devices
to swiotlb, as you suggest, but that seems to work against part of what
19943b0e was trying to accomplish.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists