linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911051819180.19209@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:26:53 -0500 (EST)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@...el.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive
 cooling

> It turned out there was no bug in the kernel...
...
> It would have been nice if it had made .32 from my first submission,

Yeah, the discussion settled down just as the merge window openend,
and this isn't high risk, so in retrospect I should have pushed
it into 2.6.32.

> but now it's fine for .33. It's not stable material.

I'll push the documentation update to 2.6.32.

I'll push the tweaks to 2.6.33.
I don't expec that this will need to be back-ported
as only advanced users who also have this BIOS bug will be messing
around setting their own custom passive trip point in the first place.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/