[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091107175846.GA5361@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:58:46 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, dhowells@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
adilger@....com, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, drepper@...il.com,
jamie@...reable.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 resend] vfs: new O_NODE open flag
Hi!
> > > I'm more and more convinced, that the current behavior is the right
> > > one.
> >
> > I think the 15 or so years we have had the current behavior without
> > problems is persuasive.
> >
> > I think it is an interesting puzzle on how to get dup instead of
> > reopen as there are cases where that could be useful behavior as well.
>
> Probably doable with ptrace().
Confused, where does ptrace fit the picture?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists