[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091108125527.GA19350@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:55:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC x86_64 more accurate KSTK_ESP implementation
* Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> wrote:
> > I'd suggest a competely different method: why dont you use an IPI to
> > sample the SP whenever someone wants to read it from /proc and we
> > see that the task is running on a CPU right now?
>
> Sounds like a challenge, i like the idea. I will have a look on it...
It's not a fastpath, so smp_function_call() ought to do the trick.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists