[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091108131655.GA12837@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:16:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, therm: Only read the initial value of thermal LVT
entry on BSP
* Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:25:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > i dont disagree with the fix, but could we please do it a bit cleaner,
> > and initialize a proper file-scope lvtthrm_init value from a different
> > boot-CPU-only function? (not intel_init_thermal)
> >
>
> Thanks for your comments. Just want to make sure I understand correctly.
> By 'file-scope', do you want me to define lvtthrm_init as a static
> variable but not to define it in any function?
Correct - i'd suggest to put it next to other file-scope variables at
the top of the .c file. Maybe make it __read_mostly as well.
> > that makes it cleaner, and also it will work if we dont boot on
> > cpu==0. (should that ever occur)
> >
>
> May I know when will this happen?
It's not really expected - we factorize the CPU IDs (which are logical)
so that the boot CPU is 0. But relying on cpu==0 is the boot cpu is not
clean and the resulting code is harder to read.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists