[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8bf37780911080749h578d3a03ve7e08d606b71feca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:49:17 -0200
From: André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@...il.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] vsprintf: factorize "(null)" string
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> wrote:
>
> Stripping the humongous Cc list for sanity.
>
>
> On Saturday 2009-11-07 16:16, André Goddard Rosa wrote:
>
>>Change "<NULL>" to "(null)" and make it a static const char[] hoping that
>>the compiler will make null_str a label to a read-only area containing it.
>
> Hoping? Nah, thanks.
:) That's just because I don't always trust gcc blindly. :)
>>See:
>>http://udrepper.livejournal.com/13851.html
>
> Ulrich's example already _has_ a variable that is then changed from
> const char * to const char[]. Of course doing that will save you the
> extra pointer.
> But vsprintf.c on the other hand did not have that extra variable to
> begin with!
Correct, of course! Most relevant reference is the first one:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf part 2.4.2
The others are just related/akin to the topic; interesting nevertheless.
> But it is ok nevertheless, and the unification of <NULL> vs
> (null) is worthwhile.
Thanks,
André
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists