linux-kernel - Re: specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1257758104.4108.152.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:15:04 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:09 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> +       smp_read_barrier_depends();
>         cpumask_setall(cpus);
> +       cpumask_and(cpus, cpus, cpu_online_mask);


how about: cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_online_mask); ?

Also, iirc cpu_online_mask is guaranteed stable when preemption is
disabled, otherwise you need to use get/put_online_cpus(), an
rmb_depends() won't do.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/