lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:43:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...glemail.com> cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc5-mmotm1101 - lockdep whinge during early boot On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > > > > Which basically reverts commit 7285dd7fd375763bfb8ab1ac9cf3f1206f503c16 > > > > > > > It is this commit in linux-next: > > > > commit 66b1a72ceaa7da811db025855f19482f0a38e815 > > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Date: Thu Sep 10 19:39:52 2009 +0200 > > > > Revert "clocksource: Resolve cpu hotplug dead lock with TSC unstable" > > > > This reverts commit 7285dd7fd375763bfb8ab1ac9cf3f1206f503c16. > > > > causes crashes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Eeek. We fixed this in mainline via: > > commit f79e0258ea1f04d63db499479b5fb855dff6dbc5 > Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> > Date: Fri Sep 11 15:33:05 2009 +0200 > > clocksource: Resolve cpu hotplug dead lock with TSC unstable, fix crash > > and > > commit 54a6bc0b071c50150bc6d1da16c2cd9a963e288c > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> > Date: Mon Sep 14 19:49:02 2009 +0200 > > clocksource: Delay clocksource down rating to late boot > > > These patches came via the tip tree right at the beginning of the > merge window several days _before_ I asked Linus to pull the timer > code for 32. > > So there is something weird going on. Ok, figured out what happened. The revert has been in next via the tip-tree for some days when testing turned up the problem and the fixes were not ready. So it looks like Andrew picked exactly such a linux-next snapshot to create his baseline patch. linux-next, tip, mainline of today all have the correct and functional code. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists