lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:16:16 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <>,
	LKML <>,
	pm list <>,
	Greg KH <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Jesse Barnes <>
Subject: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to
 preempt_count leakage in keventd

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 

> > ok, then my observation should not apply.
> I think it _IS_ releated because the worker_thread is CPU affine and
> the debug_smp_processor_id() check does:
>     if (cpumask_equal(&current->cpus_allowed, cpumask_of(this_cpu)))
> which prevents that usage of smp_processor_id() in ksoftirqd and
> keventd in preempt enabled regions is warned on.
> We saw exaclty the same back trace with fd21073 (sched: Fix affinity
> logic in select_task_rq_fair()).
> Rafael, can you please add a printk to debug_smp_processor_id() so we
> can see on which CPU we are running ? I suspect we are on the wrong
> one.

I wonder if that's not intimately related to the problem I had, namely
newidle balancing offline CPUs as they're coming up, making a mess of
cpu enumeration.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists