[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257780393.4108.343.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:26:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: Likley stupid question on "throttle_vm_writeout"
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:15 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi, (please CC me on replies)
>
> I have a likely stupid question on the function "throttle_vm_writeout". Looking at the code I find:
>
> if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
> global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
> break;
> congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
>
> Shouldn't the NR_FILE_DIRTY pages be considered as well?
Ha, you just trod onto a piece of ugly I'd totally forgotten about ;-)
The intent of throttle_vm_writeout() is to limit the total pages in
writeout and to wait for them to go-away.
Everybody hates the function, nobody managed to actually come up with
anything better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists