linux-kernel - Re: Likley stupid question on "throttle_vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:26:33 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: Likley stupid question on "throttle_vm_writeout"

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:15 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi, (please CC me on replies)
> 
>  I have a likely stupid question on the function "throttle_vm_writeout". Looking at the code I find:
> 
>                 if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
>                         global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
>                                 break;
>                 congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
> 
> Shouldn't the NR_FILE_DIRTY pages be considered as well?

Ha, you just trod onto a piece of ugly I'd totally forgotten about ;-)

The intent of throttle_vm_writeout() is to limit the total pages in
writeout and to wait for them to go-away.

Everybody hates the function, nobody managed to actually come up with
anything better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/