[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091109.122712.865412965745306501.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:27:12 +0900 (JST)
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
tglx@...utronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de,
acme@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] Adding general performance benchmarking
subcommand to perf.
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] Adding general performance benchmarking subcommand to perf.
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:30:13 +0100
> > >
> > > Shouldnt we output the unit of measurement, i.e. '4.575 usecs'? Also, we
> > > should perhaps print something like:
> > >
> > > % perf bench sched pipe
> > >
> > > (executing 1000000 pipe operations between two tasks)
> > >
> > > 4.575 usecs per op
> > > 218579 ops/sec
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > I have to admit that single float value output is too simple.
> > So I'll fix the default output.
> >
> > But, I believe that simple form makes sense for
> > processing by scripts or graph tools like gnuplot.
> > I'll add the option (may be --simple) to switch
> > friendliness of outputs.
>
> Btw., could you make it Git-ish, i.e.:
>
> --format=short
>
> or:
>
> --format=simple
>
> Eventually more format options might be added.
It's good idea.
I have to admit that reserving -s for simple output is not good idea.
I'll do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists