[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091109164053.GB5160@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:40:53 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
marcin.slusarz@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] extend get/setrlimit to support setting rlimits
external to a process (v7)
On 11/09, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> + ppid = find_get_pid(pid);
> + if (!ppid)
> + goto out;
> +
> + tsk = get_pid_task(ppid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +
> + if (!tsk)
> + goto out_put_pid;
> +
> + if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
> + goto out_put_all;
> +
> + retval = -EBUSY;
> + if (!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags))
>
> X task_lock below cannot nest inside sighand (according to Oleg)
Yes, this is deadlockable.
Also, I don't understand why wthis code get's both pid and task_struct().
And the "if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)" check is racy afaics, see
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125200862124872
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists