lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:50:23 +0900 (JST) From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> To: mingo@...e.hu Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, acme@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] Adding general performance benchmarking subcommand to perf. From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] Adding general performance benchmarking subcommand to perf. Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:55:12 +0100 > > * Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote: > > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] Adding general performance benchmarking subcommand to perf. > > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:30:13 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > > Shouldnt we output the unit of measurement, i.e. '4.575 usecs'? Also, we > > > > > should perhaps print something like: > > > > > > > > > > % perf bench sched pipe > > > > > > > > > > (executing 1000000 pipe operations between two tasks) > > > > > > > > > > 4.575 usecs per op > > > > > 218579 ops/sec > > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > I have to admit that single float value output is too simple. > > > > So I'll fix the default output. > > > > > > > > But, I believe that simple form makes sense for > > > > processing by scripts or graph tools like gnuplot. > > > > I'll add the option (may be --simple) to switch > > > > friendliness of outputs. > > > > > > Btw., could you make it Git-ish, i.e.: > > > > > > --format=short > > > > > > or: > > > > > > --format=simple > > > > > > Eventually more format options might be added. > > > > It's good idea. > > I have to admit that reserving -s for simple output is not good idea. > > I'll do this. > > I think --format=simple will be used by scripts mostly, so it doesnt > matter that it's longer to type. We try to save the shorter options for > humans and be conservative with them. > > Another angle is coherency between different subcommands - and '-s' is > already used as -s/--sort in other perf subcommands, which does not > match up with the '-s/--simple' usage. > > We try to match what the Git project does here - a good deal of > infrastructure code in perf came from Git and i find Git very easy to > use and it's managed well. > > It's not a hard rule: not all option name incoherencies are fixable or > avoidable, and there's no big problem if something slips in - i just > wanted to mention so that you can keep an eye on it when developing new > features for perf bench. > > Ingo > I added --format as option of bench subcommand, not of each suites. Because I thought that flavors of formatting are common thing across the suites. Example of use: % ./perf bench sched pipe # with no style specify (executing 1000000 pipe operations between two tasks) Total time:5.855 sec 5.855061 usecs/op 170792 ops/sec % ./perf bench --format=simple sched pipe # specified simple ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ # <- --format is here 5.988 How do you think? I'll send patch series later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists