linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] bootmem: add free_bootmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:22:46 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chrisw@...s-sol.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	vegard.nossum@...il.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] bootmem: add free_bootmem_late

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:00:29 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:48:32 +0100
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Add a new function for freeing bootmem after the bootmem allocator has
> > > > been released and the unreserved pages given to the page allocator.
> > > > This allows us to reserve bootmem and then release it if we later
> > > > discover it was not needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/bootmem.h |    1 +
> > > >  mm/bootmem.c            |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Hm, we are now further complicating the bootmem model.
> > 
> > Yeah, agreed. But reorganizing the allocator during boot is not easy. 
> > I'll investigate it later on but VT-d people want to fix this IOMMU 
> > issue now. Can we accept this for now?
> 
> Since the patchset weighs heavily towards the iommu and x86 side i can 
> do that in tip:core/iommu tree, if there's an Acked-by for this 
> bootmem.c patch from at least one of these gents:

ok

>  Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>  Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>  Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>  Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Can you give ACKs?


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/