linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vt: make the default cursor shape configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091109220944.GH14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:09:44 +0100
From:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: make the default cursor shape configurable

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:28:03AM +1030, David Newall wrote:
> Daniel Mack wrote:
> > And even if the cursor behaviour is changable at runtime, I don't see
> > why it shouldn't have a selectable compile time default. Which is what
> > the patch adds.
> 
> 
> It seems like adding cruft to the kernel that is just as effectively
> available at run-time. Where does it end? Do we eventually add bash to
> the kernel?

One more thing:

Clemens' last patch didn't add anything to the kernel's binary size.
It didn't slow down anything either, as there is no run-time condition
evaluation. It just makes something configurable which was hard
coded before. So where's the cruft?

The comparison to 'bash in the kernel' is really inappropriate.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/