[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1iqdkedqw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:35:51 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> There has been a gradual transition from the assumption that the table ends with
>> !ctl_name to the assumption that procname == NULL. There is no sysctl entry
>> with a valid ctl_name without a valid procname.
>
> I see. Then, please add below one to your patchset.
Applied thanks.
Now that sysctl is all based on /proc/sys I hope someday we can kill
sysctl_perm. As it seems redundant.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists