lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <>
Cc:	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]:

> Hi,
> Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
> memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
> (It's not NUMA-aware ...)
> Thanks for great works.
> For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
> __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.
> Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
> Patch 2/2 is for percpu.
> Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
> Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.

How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW,
I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches,
I might post an iteration once I have some good results.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists