[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091109070421.GD3042@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]:
> Hi,
>
> Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
> memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
> (It's not NUMA-aware ...)
> Thanks for great works.
>
> For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
> __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.
>
>
> Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
> Patch 2/2 is for percpu.
>
> Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
> Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.
How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW,
I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches,
I might post an iteration once I have some good results.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists