lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:34:21 +0530 From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>, cl@...ux-foundation.org, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-11-06 17:52:42]: > Hi, > > Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite > memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter. > (It's not NUMA-aware ...) > Thanks for great works. > > For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of > __this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time. > > > Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2) > Patch 2/2 is for percpu. > > Tested on my 8cpu box and works well. > Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm. How do the test results look? DO you see a significant boost? BTW, I've been experimenting a bit with the earlier percpu counter patches, I might post an iteration once I have some good results. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists