[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110095255.GD1773@smtp.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:52:55 +0200
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: List Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: iio: tsl2563 ambient light sensor driver
On 09 Nov 09, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > On 09 Nov 09, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >> Hi Amit,
> >>
> >> Normally I'd welcome this in IIO, except that all ambient light sensors are in the
> >> process of moving to the new ALS subsystem. There are still some issues to resolve
> >> in that subsystem (mainly to do with naming conventions) but hopefully we will
> >> get them sorted out shortly.
> >
> > Groan! :)
> You have my sympathies on this! Typical that the first other developer to put
> forward a patch for IIO picks the one type of device we are moving out.
Hehe :) Will accelerometers and leds move to IIO?
> If you do have any comments on IIO as a result of using it please send them
> on.
I guess the only major comment would be that the Documentation/device.txt
probably needs to be more focussed on driver writers. For example,
indio_dev->attrs
general attributes such as polled access to device channels.
would become
indio_dev->attrs
sysfs attribute control files. This contains a pointer to a struct
attribute_group containing a list of all attributes that export a
sysfs control.
followed by a sample driver stub. That is probably the only part where I got
stuck for a bit. The rest was straightforward after looking at the source for
the tsl2561.
> > Who will be the subsystem maintainer and is there already a public git
> > tree?
> No git tree as far as I know. Maintainer is Zhang Rui (Cc'd)
> Zhang, what are your plans wrt to that? I guess I can put one up with the current
> patches if it is helpful? We really need to sort out the naming issue as the one
> thing that people have come out against.
No plans. Just wanted to know if there was a tree where I could pull in
regularly to see changes without having to wade through LKML :)
> After that I'm guessing ping Andrew Morton to see if he is willing to handle the push
> to Linus? Or does Zhang want to try doing one directly?
>
> >> I'll take a close look at this sometime over the next few days though. On a quick
> >> glance at the data sheet, it looks very similar to the tsl2561. Perhaps we can merge
> >> the drivers? Yours is certainly more complete than the tsl2561 version in IIO so it
> >> would make sense to lift the functional elements in to the code I have for an ALS
> >> driver. I hadn't posted that previously as I hadn't quite worked out how to handle
> >> the various gain related settings. What you have done seems to make sense (from a very
> >> quick look.)
> >
> > I've got no problem merging the tsl2563 with 2561. I don't have any 2561
> > hardware to check a merged driver though.
>
> On a reasonably thorough review of data sheets I think the only difference is the
> input voltage range and a few timing parameters. These two chips even use the same
> addresses. I'll actually test your driver against the tsl2561 sometime later in the
> week to be sure. So the merge looks like adding a few more lines to the i2c_device_id
> table. As a quick comment you would ideally have the tsl2563 and tsl2562 in there
> already.
> >
> >
> > Do you think the ALS framework will be finalised before the 2.6.33 merge
> > window (in a few weeks)? If not, I wonder if Greg would take this driver to
> > staging to begin with and I'll modify it to use the ALS subsystem when it
> > settles down.
> I'm certainly happy with that as an option if Greg is willing. In fact,
> adding this with tsl2560-> tsl2563 support and removing the current tsl2561 driver would
> be great (post any reviews over the next couple of days).
>
I could certainly add support for tsl2560-2562 to my driver if you want, along
with incorporating comments from the review.
Regards,
Amit
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Developer, Verdurent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists