| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091110101000.GC575@nibiru.local> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:10:00 +0100 From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@...ux.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: FatELF patches... * Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at> wrote: > The only remotely useful benefit in the long run I can imagine is: The > permanent cross-compiling will make AC_TRY_RUN() go away. Or at least > the alternatives are applicable without reading the generated > configure.sh (and config.log) to guess how to tell the script some > details. hmm, that could be the real killer argument - evolutionarily sort out the guys who're too dumb to write proper buildscripts ;-) cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists